Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:11

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Here comes the bridal gown tariff - NPR

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Google Is Now Rolling Out AI Mode In The US - Search Engine Roundtable

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Panleukopenia Outbreak Prompts Immediate Suspension of Cat Intake at Bishop Animal Shelter - Manatee County

Let’s just make it real clear:

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

In what ways is Bollywood becoming westernized?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

35 Father’s Day Gifts For Anyone Who Still Doesn’t Know What The Heck To Get Their Dad - BuzzFeed

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Thank you.

Ex-NASCAR driver Danica Patrick weighs in on Riley Gaines and Simone Biles' social media feud over trans athletes - New York Post

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Astrophotographer captures the heart of the Lagoon Nebula glowing below a cosmic Trifid (photo) - Space

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Broadcom’s AI Bonanza Has Limits - WSJ

What’s next?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

NASA robot for drilling on icy moons tested on Alaskan glacier - Ars Technica